How good are on-line reviews for physicians?

Furious crowd of people protesting for human rights on the streets. Focus is on Caucasian woman with raised arm.
0 35

We compare the online reviews of 221 “Questionable” Illinois and Indiana physicians with multiple paid medical malpractice claims and disciplinary sanctions with matched control physicians with clean records. Across five prominent online rating services, we find small, mostly insignificant differences in star ratings and written reviews for Questionable versus control physicians. Only one rating service (Healthgrades) reports on paid medical malpractice claims and disciplinary actions and it misses more than 90% of these actions. We also evaluate the online ratings of 171 Illinois hospitals and find that their ratings are largely uncorrelated with the share of hospital-affiliated physicians with paid medical malpractice claims and disciplinary sanctions. Online ratings have limited utility in helping patients avoid physicians with troubled medical malpractice and disciplinary records, and steering patients away from hospitals at which more physicians have paid medical malpractice claims and disciplinary sanctions.

That is from a new paper by David A. Hyman, Jing Liu, and Bernard S. Black.  Via the excellent Kevin Lewis.

The post How good are on-line reviews for physicians? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.